NEW DELHI: Supreme Courtroom has exercised its suo motu energy a document 10 occasions this yr taking cognisance of numerous points, the audacious judicial order of a Calcutta excessive courtroom choose being the primary and the rape-murder of a health care provider at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical School & Hospital being the newest. Most of them, nonetheless, have remained inconclusive.
Whereas one must await the plan of action of the CJI-led bench on Tuesday within the RG Kar hospital incident, a matter coping with the remission coverage of Chhattisgarh which attracted the SC’s suo motu consideration six months in the past, is but to be listed.
In one other occasion, the SC took cognisance by itself of the Madhya Pradesh HC terminating the companies of six girls judicial officers. Although proceedings had been initiated on December 17 final yr, a bench led by Justice B V Nagarathna is but to succeed in a conclusion.
One other Calcutta HC judgement passing sweeping remarks gratuitously asking adolescent ladies to “management sexual urge as within the eyes of the society, she is the loser when she provides in to benefit from the sexual pleasure of hardly two minutes.” SC titled its proceedings ‘In Re: Proper to privateness of adolescent’ and expunged the observations. However the judgment, reserved on Might 17, is but to be pronounced.
Between 1991-2022, it took suo motu cognisance of 50-odd circumstances, 10 of these, prompted by the depredations of the Covid pandemic in 2020, together with taking inventory of oxygen provide to Delhi and states, offering correct healthcare to sufferers and dignified dealing with of our bodies in hospitals, making certain satisfactory relaxation to docs working tirelessly by the difficult occasions, retaining judiciary purposeful by digital mode and asking govts to offer aid and rehabilitation to youngsters orphaned by Covid.
This yr’s first suo motu civil case was registered by the SC on January 28, when it completely stayed Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s order asking SC secretary common to ship him the paperwork that had been positioned earlier than the CJI. Gangopadhyay has since resigned as a choose of Calcutta HC and obtained elected to Lok Sabha on BJP ticket.
Two extra suo motu proceedings had been initiated by the SC regarding recruitment of individuals with disabilities and visually impaired in judiciary. In April, the SC had taken out proceedings in opposition to Gautam Budh Nagar District Bar Affiliation workplace bearers for alleged assault on SC Bar Affiliation members, who had appeared earlier than the trial courtroom regardless of a strike name.
In Might, CJI DY Chandrachud had initiated suo motu proceedings for expediting the shifting Bombay excessive courtroom to a brand new constructing. The HC, functioning since January 1879 from a four-storied stone construction resembling a fort in-built gothic type and reflecting Mumbai’s multi-cultural ethos and enthusiasm, would transfer to a contemporary constructing to be constructed at a 30-acre plot in Bandra East.
The final suo motu proceedings earlier than the CJI had been provoked by the audacious order of a Punjab and Haryana HC choose, Rajbir Sehrawat, who had solid doubts on the knowledge and majesty of the best courtroom. The SC had expunged the choose’s unwarranted remarks with a warning.
In 2023, the SC took suo motu cognisance in three issues, one regarding administration of Sariska Tiger Reserve and a temple inside it attracting 1000’s of devotees. SC had constituted a committee to discover a answer to this challenge that could possibly be a flash level between setting proection and pursuit of religion.
Whereas one must await the plan of action of the CJI-led bench on Tuesday within the RG Kar hospital incident, a matter coping with the remission coverage of Chhattisgarh which attracted the SC’s suo motu consideration six months in the past, is but to be listed.
In one other occasion, the SC took cognisance by itself of the Madhya Pradesh HC terminating the companies of six girls judicial officers. Although proceedings had been initiated on December 17 final yr, a bench led by Justice B V Nagarathna is but to succeed in a conclusion.
One other Calcutta HC judgement passing sweeping remarks gratuitously asking adolescent ladies to “management sexual urge as within the eyes of the society, she is the loser when she provides in to benefit from the sexual pleasure of hardly two minutes.” SC titled its proceedings ‘In Re: Proper to privateness of adolescent’ and expunged the observations. However the judgment, reserved on Might 17, is but to be pronounced.
Between 1991-2022, it took suo motu cognisance of 50-odd circumstances, 10 of these, prompted by the depredations of the Covid pandemic in 2020, together with taking inventory of oxygen provide to Delhi and states, offering correct healthcare to sufferers and dignified dealing with of our bodies in hospitals, making certain satisfactory relaxation to docs working tirelessly by the difficult occasions, retaining judiciary purposeful by digital mode and asking govts to offer aid and rehabilitation to youngsters orphaned by Covid.
This yr’s first suo motu civil case was registered by the SC on January 28, when it completely stayed Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s order asking SC secretary common to ship him the paperwork that had been positioned earlier than the CJI. Gangopadhyay has since resigned as a choose of Calcutta HC and obtained elected to Lok Sabha on BJP ticket.
Two extra suo motu proceedings had been initiated by the SC regarding recruitment of individuals with disabilities and visually impaired in judiciary. In April, the SC had taken out proceedings in opposition to Gautam Budh Nagar District Bar Affiliation workplace bearers for alleged assault on SC Bar Affiliation members, who had appeared earlier than the trial courtroom regardless of a strike name.
In Might, CJI DY Chandrachud had initiated suo motu proceedings for expediting the shifting Bombay excessive courtroom to a brand new constructing. The HC, functioning since January 1879 from a four-storied stone construction resembling a fort in-built gothic type and reflecting Mumbai’s multi-cultural ethos and enthusiasm, would transfer to a contemporary constructing to be constructed at a 30-acre plot in Bandra East.
The final suo motu proceedings earlier than the CJI had been provoked by the audacious order of a Punjab and Haryana HC choose, Rajbir Sehrawat, who had solid doubts on the knowledge and majesty of the best courtroom. The SC had expunged the choose’s unwarranted remarks with a warning.
In 2023, the SC took suo motu cognisance in three issues, one regarding administration of Sariska Tiger Reserve and a temple inside it attracting 1000’s of devotees. SC had constituted a committee to discover a answer to this challenge that could possibly be a flash level between setting proection and pursuit of religion.
