Major CAS rulings during Paris Olympics as Vinesh Phogat’s appeal awaits decision | Paris Olympics 2024 News – Times of India

Major CAS rulings during Paris Olympics as Vinesh Phogat’s appeal awaits decision | Paris Olympics 2024 News – Times of India



NEW DELHI: The Court docket of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has been a distinguished subject in latest information, notably in India, following the disqualification of wrestler Vinesh Phogat on August 7 for being 100 grams obese throughout her second day weigh-in earlier than the gold medal bout within the 50kg freestyle occasion. The 29-year-old athlete instantly filed an attraction in opposition to the choice with CAS and subsequently introduced her retirement from the game.
The ad-hoc division of CAS on Tuesday extended the suspense surrounding the end result of Vinesh Phogat’s attraction, extending the deadline for delivering its determination till August 16 with out offering particular causes for the continued deferment.

This marks the third postponement within the case, with no explanations given. In her attraction, Vinesh has requested that she be awarded a joint silver medal alongside Cuban wrestler Yusneylis Guzman Lopez, who had been defeated by Vinesh within the semifinals however superior to the ultimate as a result of Indian wrestler’s disqualification.

All through the two-week plus Summer time Video games in Paris, CAS has been actively concerned, making a number of notable selections which have saved the establishment within the highlight. A few of these selections embrace:

  • Previous to the graduation of the Paris Video games, CAS delivered a fast-track verdict, imposing a four-year doping ban on Tunisian Greco-Roman wrestler Amine Guenichi, successfully stopping him from taking part within the Olympics.
  • CAS upheld an attraction by the World Anti-Doping Company (WADA), ensuing within the exclusion of Romanian lengthy jumper Florentina Iusco from competing on the Paris Olympics resulting from a constructive check for a banned substance.
  • On the opening day of the Paris Video games, three Brazilian monitor and discipline athletes efficiently gained a CAS courtroom ruling, permitting them to compete regardless of Brazil’s substandard anti-doping program. Shot putter Livia Avancini, race walker Max Batista, and sprinter Hygor Bezerra had been initially blocked by the Athletics Integrity Unit however appealed to CAS, which upheld their authorized challenges in a fast-track ruling.
  • CAS dismissed Canada’s attraction in opposition to their soccer group’s factors deduction on the Paris Olympics amid a drone scandal. Defending champions Canada had been penalized six factors, whereas coach Bev Priestman and officers Joseph Lombardi and Jasmine Mander had been banned from any soccer-related exercise for one 12 months by FIFA after New Zealand complained that Canadian employees flew drones over their coaching classes earlier than their opening match.
  • Brazil’s soccer legend Marta misplaced her attraction in opposition to a two-game ban on the Paris Olympics. CAS said that its decide listening to the pressing case dismissed the applying by Marta and the Brazilian group. FIFA had imposed the two-game ban on the Brazil captain for the pink card she obtained in a group-stage 2-0 loss to Spain for a foul on Olga Carmona.
  • CAS dismissed a protest by the Italian Swimming Federation over the ejection of Francesco Condemi from Italy’s quarterfinal loss to Hungary within the males’s water polo match on the Paris Olympics. The 20-year-old Condemi was excluded for a violent motion with 2:22 left within the second quarter.
  • CAS voided an on-floor attraction from Jordan Chiles’ coach that vaulted her to 3rd, stating that the attraction got here 4 seconds past the one-minute time restrict for scoring inquiries. USA Gymnastics disputed the timing, claiming that they submitted video proof to CAS exhibiting Crew USA coach Cecile Landi first appealed 13 seconds earlier than the deadline. The Worldwide Gymnastics Federation (FIG) elevated Ana Barbosu of Romania to 3rd. The Worldwide Olympic Committee confirmed the ruling, saying that it was reallocating the medal.

What’s the Court docket of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)?

The Court docket of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is an unbiased establishment designed to resolve sports-related disputes by way of arbitration or mediation. CAS operates underneath procedural guidelines tailor-made particularly to fulfill the distinctive wants of the sports activities world, providing a specialised platform for athletes, groups, and sports activities organizations to hunt honest and neutral resolutions to their conflicts.
Even after the conclusion of the Paris Olympics, all eyes stay on CAS because it prepares to ship its much-anticipated verdict on Vinesh Phogat’s attraction, a call that would considerably affect the wrestling star’s legacy and the continuing discourse on equity in sports activities.







Source link