NEW DELHI: Chief of opposition within the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge requested the chairman to expunge remarks made by BJP MP Ghanshyam Tiwari over his political journey, mentioning that Congress president’s “whole household was concerned in politics”.
“He made a remark concerning ‘parivarvaad‘. I request that this must be expunged (from the information),” Kharge stated.
Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar stated he would assessment Tiwari’s feedback from the day past and guaranteed that any assertion inflicting offense to Kharge can be faraway from the document.
Following the presentation of a listed paper within the Home, Kharge addressed the remarks made by Tiwari, who had commented on Kharge’s political profession and talked about that Kharge’s whole household was concerned in politics. Kharge requested that references to “parivarvaad” be faraway from the information.
Kharge elaborated on his background, saying that he was a first-generation politician who started his profession with the Congress celebration. He talked about that his father had handed away on the age of 85.
In response, Chairman Dhankhar wished Kharge an extended life, to which Kharge responded, “I do not want to dwell for lengthy on this surroundings.”
Dhankhar, who was presiding over the Home when Tiwari made the remarks, recommended that Tiwari may not have meant any offense. The Chairman assured that the feedback can be fastidiously examined.
Kharge additionally criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet concerning remarks made by Anurag Thakur about Rahul Gandhi. Modi had shared Thakur’s feedback on X, describing them as a “good mixture of info and humour” and accusing the INDI Alliance of soiled politics.
Kharge condemned the Prime Minister’s tweet, saying, “PM Modi ought to know the place to talk and who to defend. Such inflammatory statements shouldn’t be made in Parliament.”
Kharge accused Anurag Thakur of intentionally insulting Rahul Gandhi and questioned the necessity for the Prime Minister’s involvement within the matter. He additionally highlighted that discussions about caste shouldn’t happen in Parliament, noting that many leaders from numerous events are concerned in intercaste or interfaith marriages and questioning whether or not this is able to result in scrutiny of everybody’s caste.
“He made a remark concerning ‘parivarvaad‘. I request that this must be expunged (from the information),” Kharge stated.
Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar stated he would assessment Tiwari’s feedback from the day past and guaranteed that any assertion inflicting offense to Kharge can be faraway from the document.
Following the presentation of a listed paper within the Home, Kharge addressed the remarks made by Tiwari, who had commented on Kharge’s political profession and talked about that Kharge’s whole household was concerned in politics. Kharge requested that references to “parivarvaad” be faraway from the information.
Kharge elaborated on his background, saying that he was a first-generation politician who started his profession with the Congress celebration. He talked about that his father had handed away on the age of 85.
In response, Chairman Dhankhar wished Kharge an extended life, to which Kharge responded, “I do not want to dwell for lengthy on this surroundings.”
Dhankhar, who was presiding over the Home when Tiwari made the remarks, recommended that Tiwari may not have meant any offense. The Chairman assured that the feedback can be fastidiously examined.
Kharge additionally criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet concerning remarks made by Anurag Thakur about Rahul Gandhi. Modi had shared Thakur’s feedback on X, describing them as a “good mixture of info and humour” and accusing the INDI Alliance of soiled politics.
Kharge condemned the Prime Minister’s tweet, saying, “PM Modi ought to know the place to talk and who to defend. Such inflammatory statements shouldn’t be made in Parliament.”
Kharge accused Anurag Thakur of intentionally insulting Rahul Gandhi and questioned the necessity for the Prime Minister’s involvement within the matter. He additionally highlighted that discussions about caste shouldn’t happen in Parliament, noting that many leaders from numerous events are concerned in intercaste or interfaith marriages and questioning whether or not this is able to result in scrutiny of everybody’s caste.
