He additional said that the “photographs shared as proof usually have simply the license plates & we don’t have the time to struggle this out in Lok Adalat, like most others”.
Check out the put up right here
Right here’s what Anupam Mittal stated
Just lately, an acquaintance bought a web based site visitors penalty for not carrying a helmet. He owns a automotive😅 Each month we additionally get auto-penalised by @MTPHereToHelp including as much as 1000’s for a few automobiles. Pictures shared as proof usually have simply the license plates 🤔 & we don’t have the time to struggle this out in Lok Adalat, like most others. Whereas the site visitors menace does want interventions, weaponising it with out safeguards can change into harassment @mieknathshinde Possibly dept pays residents 2x if they will’t show the violation 😇.
How X customers reacted to the put up
Mittal’s put up has sparked a wider dialog on-line, with many echoing comparable frustrations about site visitors penalties within the state. Replying to his put up, an X consumer wrote “It’s like they’re extra targeted on gathering fines than really bettering street security. There needs to be a greater system in place that enables for honest assessments and appeals. What if we had a solution to contest these penalties simply with out leaping via hoops?”.
One other consumer commented “humorous factor is i bought automotive dashing challan when i used to be overseas that day 😂😂 when Que, silently challan bought cancelled however no motion on cop who could also be generated it with photoshop 😜. “Acquired a effective for not having executed PUC on my two wheeler. It’s an electrical bike,” stated one other.
