SC bristles, mulls action as Punjab & Haryana HC judge slams apex court – Times of India

SC bristles, mulls action as Punjab & Haryana HC judge slams apex court – Times of India



NEW DELHI: Taking severe notice of “judicial indiscipline” of Punjab and Haryana excessive court docket choose Rajbir Sherawat by displaying defiance in direction of a Supreme Courtroom order, CJI D Y Chandrachud and 4 most senior judges determined to kind a bench on Wednesday to resolve the long run plan of action in regard to the HC choose’s July 17 order.
Justice Sherawat had remarked in his order: “A bent to presume the Supreme Courtroom to be extra ‘Supreme’ than it truly is and to presume a excessive court docket to be much less ‘Excessive’ than it constitutionally is.”
The bench of CJI Chandrachud, and Justices Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, Surya Kant and Hrishikesh Roy will sort out Justice Sherawat’s order, who had reluctantly adjourned a contempt continuing initiated by him due to SC’s keep.
SC course is to make HCs servile to apex court docket: Justice Sherawat
Justice Sherawat had stated, “However this (adjourning a case due to SC order) will not be at all times attainable for an HC to observe such a course in view of specific details and circumstances embedded in a specific case or due to involvement of some statutory provisions. That will be an unlucky scenario, which might higher be prevented.”
Justice Sherawat had gone on to propagate that contempt proceedings initiated by a single-judge HC bench needed to be appealed earlier than the division bench of HC and that the function of SC would come up solely when the contemnor, whose conviction is upheld by the division bench, information an enchantment within the apex court docket. It’s an elementary proven fact that SC has overarching jurisdiction over any matter earlier than any court docket, together with HCs, and on any topic whether or not pending in any court docket or not.
Justice Sherawat stated, “SC could have energy to allow a particular enchantment by a ‘occasion’ to contempt proceedings earlier than HC , in opposition to sure kinds of orders of contempt court docket below sure circumstances, nonetheless, within the current case neither there are any such circumstances, nor has any such particular enchantment been filed by the respondents in opposition to any such order of the contempt court docket. Therefore, within the given circumstances, the order of SC seems to be merely within the nature of placing an estoppel on the powers of HC exercisable below Article 215 of the Structure of India and below the Contempt of Courts Act.”
“Nevertheless, it’s extremely uncertain if the apex court docket has any such energy to remain operation of Article 215 of the Structure of India and the Contempt of Courts Act, per se. Most likely extra warning on the a part of SC would have been extra applicable,” the choose stated whereas lecturing SC on judicial propriety.
Justice Sherawat faulted SC for making an attempt to regulate the roster of HC and issuing pointers for designation of senior advocates and stated this course is to make HCs servile to SC. He stated SC didn’t fathom the injury it has brought on by staying the contempt proceedings initiated by him. Defending initiation of contempt proceedings regarding non-filling up of judicial officers’ put up, the HC choose requested, “Who’s chargeable for this plight of judicial officers manning the superior judiciary of state of Punjab and state of Haryana. Is it HC or is it SC ?”
Punching manner past his judicial weight, Justice Sherawat stated in his humble opinion HC “ought to sound a notice of warning even for SC to be extra particular in inflicting authorized penalties by way of its order”.







Source link